Jesus
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not "perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.” (John 3:16-17)
Martin Buber
“In the relation to God, unconditional exclusiveness and unconditional inclusiveness are one. For those who enter into the absolute relationship, nothing particular retains any importance—neither things nor beings, neither earth nor heaven—but everything is included in the relationship. For entering into the pure relationship does not involve ignoring everything but seeing everything in the You, not renouncing the world but placing it upon its proper ground. Looking away from the world is no help toward God; staring at the world is no help either; but whoever beholds the world in him stands in his presences…” (from
I and Thou)
C.S. Lewis
“When I attempted a few minutes ago, to describe our spiritual longings, I was omitting one of their most curious characteristics. We usually notice it just as the moment of vision dies away, as the music ends, or as the landscape loses the celestial light… For a few minutes we have had the illusion of belonging to that world. Now we wake to find that it is no such thing. We have been mere spectators. Beauty has smiled, but not to welcome us; her face turned in our direction, but not to see us. We have not been accepted, welcomed, or taken into the dance. We may go when we please, we may stay if we can, no one cares. Now, a scientist may reply that since most of the things we call beautiful are inanimate it is not very surprising that they take no notice of us. That, of course, is true. It is not the physical objects that I am speaking of, but that indescribable Something of which they become for a moment the messengers. And part of the bitterness which mixes with the sweetness of that message is due to the fact that it so seldom seems to be a message intended for us, but rather something we have overheard. By bitterness I mean pain, not resentment. We should hardly dare to ask that any notice be taken of ourselves. But we pine. The sense that in the universe we are treated as strangers, the longing to be acknowledged, to meet with some response, the bridge some chasm that yawns between us and reality, is part of our inconsolable secret.” (from
The Weight of Glory)
Terrence Malick
Badlands (1972)
Days of Heaven (1978)
The Thin Red Line (1998)
The New World (2005)
Martin Heidegger
“Truth is the truth of Being. Beauty does not occur alongside and apart from this truth. When truth sets itself into the work, it appears. Appearance—as this being of truth in the work and as work—is beauty. Thus the beautiful belongs to the advent of truth, truth’s taking of its place. It does not exist merely relative to pleasure and purely as its object.” (from “The Origin of the Work of Art.”)
Saint Paul
“Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.” (I Corinthians 13:12)
Marshall McLuhan
“All media work us over completely. They are so pervasive in their personal, political, economic, aesthetic, psychological, moral, ethical, and social consequences that they leave no part of us untouched, unaffected, unaltered.” (from
The Medium is the Massage)
Sufjan Stevens
And in my best behavior
I am really just like him
Look beneath the floorboards
For the secrets I have hid
(from “John Wayne Gacy, Jr.”)
F. Scott Fitzgerald
“And as I sat there brooding on the old unknown world, I thought of Gatsby’s wonder when he first picked out the green light at the end of Daisy’s long dock. He had come a long way to this blue lawn, and his dream must have seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it, He did not know that it was already behind him, somewhere back in that vast obscurity beyond the city, where the dark fields of the republic rolled on under the night.” (from
The Great Gatsby)
Yasujiro Ozu
Tokyo Story (1953)
George Steiner
“All representations, even the most abstract, infer a rendezvous with intelligibility or, at the least, with a strangeness attenuated, qualified by observance and willed form. Apprehension (the meeting with the other) signifies both fear and perception. The continuum between both, the modulation from one to the other, lie at the source of poetry and the arts.” (from
Real Presences)
Paul Tillich
“What is the nature of a being that is able to produce art? Man is finite. He is, as one could say, mixed of being and nonbeing. Once he was not. Now he is and some time he will not be. He is not by himself, but thrown into existence and he will be thrown out of existence and cease to be for himself. He is delivered to the flux of time which runs from the past to the future through the ever-moving point which is called the present. He is aware of the infinite. He is aware that he belongs to it. But he is also aware that he is excluded from it… Out of the anxiety, and the double awareness that we are finite and that we belong to infinity from which we are excluded, the urge arises to express the essential unity of that which we are in symbols which are religious and artistic.” (from
On Art and Architecture)
Dorothy Sayers
“Poets have, indeed, often communicated in their own mode of expression truths identical with the theologians’ truths; but just because of the difference in the modes of expression, we often fail to see the identity of the statements.” (from
The Mind of the Maker)
Over the Rhine
What a beautiful piece of heartache this has all turned out to be.
Lord knows we've learned the hard way all about healthy apathy.
And I use these words pretty loosely.
There's so much more to life than words.
(from “Latter Days”)
Soren Kierkegaard
“He will grant thee a hiding place within Him, and once hidden in Him he will hide thy sins. For He is the friend of sinners... He does not merely stand still, open His arms and say, 'Come hither'; no, he stands there and waits, as the father of the lost son waited, rather He does not stand and wait, he goes forth to seek, as the shepherd sought the lost sheep, as the woman sought the lost coin. He goes--yet no, he has gone, but infinitely farther than any shepherd or any woman, He went, in sooth, the infinitely long way from being God to becoming man, and that way He went in search of sinners.” (from
Training in Christianity)
Richard Linklater
Before Sunrise (1995)
Waking Life (2001)
Before Sunset (2004)
George MacDonald
“In what belongs to the deeper meanings of nature and her mediation between us and God, the appearances of nature are the truths of nature, far deeper than any scientific discoveries in and concerning them. The show of things is that for which God cares most, for their show is the face of far deeper things than they; we see in them, in a distant way, as in a glass darkly, the face of the unseen. It is through their show, not through their analysis, that we enter into their deepest truths. What they say to the childlike soul is the truest thing to be gathered of them.” (from
The Voice of Job)
Emily Dickinson
The Bustle in a House
The Morning after Death
Is solemnest of industries
Enacted opon Earth –
The Sweeping up the Heart
And putting Love away
We shall not want to use again
Until Eternity
John Steinbeck
“In uncertainty I am certain that underneath their topmost layers of frailty men want to be good and want to be loved. Indeed, most of their vices are attempted short cuts to love. When a man comes to die, no matter what his talents and influence and genius, if he dies unloved his life must be a failure to him and his dying a cold horror.” (from
East of Eden)
Bob Dylan
He woke up, the room was bare
He didn't see her anywhere.
He told himself he didn't care,
pushed the window open wide,
Felt an emptiness inside
to which he just could not relate
Brought on by a simple twist of fate.
(from “Simple Twist of Fate”)
Walker Percy
“What is the malaise? You ask. The malaise is the pain of loss. The world is lost to you, the world and the people in it, and there remains only you and the world and you no more able to be in the world than Banquo’s ghost.” (from
The Moviegoer)
Sofia Coppola
Virgin Suicides (2000)
Lost in Translation (2003)
Marie Antoinette (2006)
Kathleen Norris
“Church is to be participated in and not consumed. The point is not what one gets out of it, but the worship of God; the service takes place both because of and despite the needs, strengths, and frailties of the people present. How else could it be?” (from
Dakota)
Marilynne Robinson
“Whenever I think of Edward, I think of playing catch in a hot street and that wonderful weariness of the arms. I think of leaping after a high throw and that wonderful collaboration of the whole body with itself and that wonderful certainty and amazement when you know the glove is just where it should be. Oh, I will miss the world!” (from
Gilead)
N.T. Wright
“Preaching the gospel means announcing Jesus as Lord of the world; and, unless we are prepared to contradict ourselves with every breath we take, we cannot make that announcement without seeking to bring that lordship to bear over every aspect of the world.” (from
What Saint Paul Really Said).
David Bazan
It's weird to think of all the things
That have not been keeping up with the times
It's ten o' clock the sun is down
Just begun to set the western hills on fire
I hear that you don't change
How do you expect to keep up with the trends
You won't survive the information age
Unless you plan to change the truth to accommodate the brilliance of man
The brilliance of man
(from “Letter From a Concerned Follower”)
G.K. Chesterton
“Gazing at some detail like a bird or a cloud, we can all ignore its awful blue background; we can neglect the sky; and precisely because it bears down upon us with an annihilating force it is felt as nothing. A thing of this kind can only be an impression and a rather subtle impression; but to me it is a very strong impression made by pagan literature and religion. I repeat that in our special sacramental sense there is, of course, the absence of the presence of God. But there is in a very real sense the presence of the absence of God. We feel it in the unfathomable sadness of pagan poetry; for I doubt if there was ever in all the marvelous manhood of antiquity a man who was happy as St. Francis was happy.” (from
The Everlasting Man)
Gus Van Sant
Elephant (2003)
Paranoid Park (2008)
Solomon
"I have seen the task which God has given the sons of men with which to occupy themselves. He has made everything appropriate in its time. He has also set eternity in their heart, yet so that man will not find out the work which God has done from the beginning even to the end. I know that there is nothing better for them than to rejoice and to do good in one's lifetime; moreover, that every man who eats and drinks sees good in all his labor--it is the gift of God. I know that everything God does will remain forever; there is nothing to add to it and there is nothing to take from it, for God has so worked that men should fear Him. That which is has been already and that which will be has already been, for God seeks what has passed by." (Ecclesiastes 3:10-15).
Jack Kerouac
“What is that feeling when you’re driving away from people and they recede on the plain till you see their specks dispersing?—it’s the too-huge world vaulting us, and it’s good bye. But we lean forward to the next crazy venture beneath the skies.” (from
On the Road)
St. Augustine
"Thou hast made us for Thyself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they find their rest in Thee..."
Martin Luther
“Unless I am convinced by proofs from Scriptures or by plain and clear reasons and arguments, I can and will not retract, for it is neither safe nor wise to do anything against conscience. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen."
Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne
The Son (2002)
The Child (2005)
I appreciate this post a lot, Brett — especially having returned just yesterday from a Campus Crusade mission trip in Juneau, Alaska.
On the way home from the airport, I talked with my friend who had picked me up about the sins of our generation. I agree with you that in hindsight we will see that we were too hesitant to speak the Gospel — and that coming from someone who isn’t a huge fan of going around sharing the Four Spiritual Laws with strangers. Which is to say, I think there’s a middle ground between abrasive proselytizing and social justice devoid of any transcendent message.
On our recent trip to Southeast Alaska, we had the privilege of spending Fourth of July weekend in Angoon, a Native Alaska village. Though I had visited Angoon last summer, ideas about colonialism and imperialism had since popped onto my radar screen. I became worried a month or so from our trip that we might be committing spiritual imperialism: using the Natives and our time in their community to make ourselves feel all nice and spiritual. As it turned out, though, we were warmly welcomed. And I think the guys I was leading did a great job of participating in Angoon’s holiday traditions and learning about Tlingit culture and interacting with the Natives on their own terms.
Thanks again for the post, Brett. Keep up the good work.
There needs to be a balance for sure. In my opinion, the abundance of short-term missions opportunities have changed the game. If you are going on a one week missions trip to build a house, I’m not sure it’s really your place to be evangelizing in a strange culture when you will be leaving in a matter of days.
Let the long-term missionaries who have the relationships and knowledge of the culture do that. They probably know how to do it better than you anyway, right?
Regardless, great post.
Agreed. Without words AND deeds, we’re presenting a skewed message at best.
Regarding St. Francis, if I understand correctly, his statement was made to his friars as they roamed about (and preached a lot in churches). In other words, people knew they were religious monk-types. There was no mistaking the good deeds of a friar for those of a well-meaning atheist, New Ager, or Buddhist. If someone goes around wearing a t-shirt that says, “I am a Christian. Ask me about it sometime,” then I’ll cut him some slack if he doesn’t talk much. That would be more like the situation Francis’s statement was aimed at.
Also, he didn’t say, “NEVER use words.” I think he was trying to remind his followers that their deeds ought to match their professed beliefs, and they ought to be humble rather than try to control others–as those who are preachy usually do. Anyway, my point is I think those who use St. Francis to support their reluctance or refusal to evangelize have got him all wrong.
Christianity Today’s Mark Galli has a good article on the “Preach the Gospel always, and if necessary, use words.” quote: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/mayweb-only/120-42.0.html.
While Galli’s article is good, he doesn’t represent Francis well in respect to this very popular quote. On this topic (and Galli’s post) I wrote the following last year. I hope you might find it helpful:
http://www.missional.ca/2009/06/preach-the-gospel-at-all-times/
Marshall McLuhan wrote, “The medium is the message.”
Whether the message is of a healing gospel or of something else, if it is not mediated through loving actions, it will be lost, or misunderstood. If we objectify those we serve and reduce our message to the content itself that we are supposedly “teaching” – if we separate ourselves from those we are ministering to, then the true message of Christianity, of the word made flesh, will be diminished.
I’m with “pursuingintegration” and would argue that prioritizing word over deed (or vice versa) usually only becomes an issue in the instance of short-term “missions” trips.
The distinction between “making disciples” and “making converts” is one of time invested.
Likewise, serving the neighbourhood often leads to loving your neighbour – provided you’re afforded enough time to actually get to know the people who collectively make up said neighbourhood.
All this to suggest that if we were to ask Jesus “who is my neigbhour?” today, He just might answer with a story pointing us back to the people we actually live beside…
Great thoughts and analysis here, Brett. Appreciate the challenge.
In a word, yes. :)
I must admit I’ve never been a fan of Assisi’s maxim. Has not Gospel proclamation always (eventually) used words?
A group I know refers to these short-term “mission trips” as “servant events”. I think that might be a more accurate term – they are opportunities for Christians to serve others. Do we hope there will be an opportunity to proclaim the Gospel because of these types of events? Surely. But the events themselves – in the example, building the house – are not “missions”. They may provide the opportunity to mission to happen, but in and of themselves, they are serving others, nothing more (and, it must be said, nothing less!).
Reading both this post and Galli’s on St. Francis, what strikes me is the tension in the phrase “when necessary”. It seems to me that the whole of the question of words vs. deeds falls on whether one has sense of what is necessary. It seems to me where one approach would be more “necessary” than the other. Perhaps, St. Augustine’s encouragement to “do all things in love” would be a useful rubric for deciding when words are “necessary”.
Excuse me i meant to say:
“It seems to me that there may be times where one approach would be more “necessary” than the other”.
I apologize for poor editing.
Great essay. Jesus gave many instructions and commissions. It’s easy to pick and chose, but the Great commission is the end game.
Insightful and incisive post, as usual Brett.
Nothing matters if the Good News isn’t communicated. I could build my neighbor the nicest house on the block, if I haven’t clearly communicated the message of Christ to him, I’ve failed. Speaking for myself, I know that one tendency which hinders me in this area sometimes is being preoccupied with myself in the situation. As believers, this really has nothing to do with us. We are simply serving as Christ’s proxy in the conversation, as a conduit for the Spirit to speak to another soul. So to be concerned with how we will be perceived or whether our intentions could be construed as imperialistic, etc is really irrelevant. The only question that matters is: Was the Message clearly shared?
Also, just wondering what “social justice” is, Brett. I’m certainly all for Justice, but I’m not aware of a need for a subcategory of Justice. Maybe you wouldn’t mind fleshing out this term so I understand?
It seems that the deeds-over-speech shift is a response of the younger generation to feeling ashamed of the Church and distancing themselves. And I get it! I remember with much discomfort the day-long field trip in my lifestyle evangelism class in college where we were sent out to share the gospel with as many people as we could in one day. However, acting in response to shame will not beautify the Bride of Christ. The service-only mentality will absolutely do a great deal of good and may be a good exercise for those who find themselves talking too much, but it will not redeem negative perceptions. I love getting to draw attention to churches that *gasp* actually do what the Bible commands. I love getting to show people what the Church is supposed to look like–not loving only with “words or tongue” but with “actions and in truth.” (1 Jn 3:18)
But, to show love with actions and in truth, the truth must be communicated!
Maybe this is while I’ll never be really a Protestant. I think this shows considerable blindness to the reality of history–the awful, bloody history of conquest and colonization. Deeds, not words, are the ways to demonstrate to people the message of the Gospel. The implication that there are casual ways of mentioning it that is not harmful shows a singularly first world perspective that ignores a bloody history and a still existent cultural and economic domination from first world countries that preach Christianity and practice the imperialistic doctrine of nation building and laissez faire economics.
We’re not at the point where our actions are innocuous as Christians going to parts of the world (that often have very strong Christian communities) that have experienced long term entrenched poverty, which at the very least, is not abetted by the punishing policies of the world bank and unwillingness of industrialized countries to act as economic partners.
Snacktastic, I’m don’t want to engage in an economic debate here, but I always bristle when people blame poverty on laissez-faire economics. Check out Hernando de Soto’s “The Mystery of Capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west but fails everywhere else”. His take is basically that rule of law, some political stability, and strong private property rights are essential if capitalism is to work as it should. Those conditions typically have not attained in the developing world. The conditions facing the developing world are not unusual: they have been the norm throughout history. It is the advances that the developed world has made that are so unusual, and those were made possible by the free market system working together with individual liberty guarantees that were previously unheard of.
i feel like we’re making this conversation a lot more complicated than it is, though i don’t want to be rude in saying so. i also feel there’s been a lot of opinion stated with little bible. if i didn’t know better, i’d say we were followers of saint francis and not Jesus Christ.
summary statements of Jesus’ ministry on earth generally go something like this: “Jesus was preaching the good news of the kingdom and healing every disease and sickness.”
when he commissions the 72 in luke 10, Jesus tells them to heal the sick and to preach that the kingdom of God is near.
we are the body of Christ today, and we are commissioned by him to go into the world. it seems plain to me, then, that both words and deeds are necessary.
the question for me, then, is one of practical application. “how do we do this in the realm of foreign missions?”
then other questions of practicality arise:
– are deeds and service an access ministry?
– are they an access ministry only?
– what do we actually preach? Jesus preached the kingdom — are we preaching personal salvation instead?
– is it feasible for one family on the mission field to manage both the words and deeds?
– or do our different gifts within the body require that we work together to accomplish Jesus’ mission?
– if partnership is required, should Christian missionaries do the ‘word’ bit and partner with existing ngos who are already doing the service and deeds?
– or should we form large enough teams to keep all this “in house?”
– how and when do nationals enter the process?
– etc.
Again, I believe we’re getting way off track.
@ snacktastic – deeds sans words cannot communicate the truth of the Gospel. Period. There is a reason why Christ is called The Word. The truth of the Gospels is born out by the actions of a believer who is compelled by the love of Christ but our deeds cannot bring us to salvation, nor can they bring anyone else there either. They simply testify to the truth of The Word, they cannot substitute for The Word. Also, I’m really trying hard to think of a “first world country that preaches Christianity” but practices nation building. Maybe you can help me out with some actual historical examples.
@ James – I have some honest questions and I hope you won’t be offended by them. Why did Christ die? And how exactly can we “accomplish Jesus’ mission”?
“The Sermon on the Mount indicates that when we are on Jesus Christ’s errands, there is no time to stand up for ourselves. Jesus says, in effect, Do not be bothered with whether you are being justly dealt with or not. To look for justice is a sign of deflection from devotion to Him. Never look for justice in this world, but never cease to give it. If we look for justice, we will begin to grouse and to indulge in the discontent of self-pity – Why should I be treated like that? If we are devoted to Jesus Christ we have nothing to do with what we meet, whether it is just or unjust.”
– Oswald Chambers, “My Utmost for His Highest”
luke, there are two “james” above, but based on the portion of your post that includes a quote, i believe you were speaking to me. i apologize if i am wrong.
and i’m not offended by your questions, though i am a bit overwhelmed in that good answers to these questions could be quite lengthy — and because these are typically the kinds of questions asked when one is wanting the other to give a wrong answer, or setting a trap per se. i’m reminded of the teachers of the law and Jesus.
but, all that aside, i’ll attempt to give you my best answers, trusting that you are indeed interested in actual conversation and not tricks and snares:
“Why did Christ die?”
– Christ died for the sins of the world, in order to bring reconciliation and restore relationship. He died (and rose) so that he could be the Lord of the living and the dead. His death ushered in a new kingdom and is an example to us that we, too, must die to enter into that kingdom and true life.
“And how exactly can we ‘accomplish Jesus’ mission?'”
– we are to be the body of Christ in our communities. we proclaim Christ and his kingdom as we serve, and minister to, one another and those in our communities. we make disciples, acknowledging that it is not our responsibility to draw men to God or to save them. but our responsibility is to proclaim the gospel as we live obedient lives to the glory of God.
This is a very, very difficult topic, so I am glad you are highlighting it. Having spent more than 15 years discipling young Christians for missions and missional life, this has been a constant tension. Two major challenges (among many) stand out.
First, there is very little available to help disciple these young missionaries in a new kind of proclamation. We affirm the need for a proclaimed Gospel, but find that all too often it becomes repackaged, well-intentioned repetitions of unhealthy approaches & understandings. I am not suggesting we have to have a model that is put in a box, but we need to demonstrate some tangible alternatives.
Second, many forget than doing good deeds can be equally colonial. Both emphases, done out of even an unintentional assumption of superiority or primacy, can be ineffective at best, harmful at worst. The book “When Helping Hurts” is one example of an attempt to demonstrate this.
Just some thoughts.
jamie, you wrote: “First, there is very little available to help disciple these young missionaries in a new kind of proclamation.”
what do you mean by a new kind of proclamation?
our mission team uses as its “tangible alternative” the bible in small groups. i don’t teach the bible studies, rather i mentor a facilitator in each group who leads his group in reading and interpreting the text.
i feel two of the biggest problems in missions today are that 1) we don’t trust God to draw souls to him and the Holy Spirit to mature leadership, etc, and 2) because of this distrust, we form elaborate methods and systems for mission.
All I mean is that the forms of evangelism that are rightfully seen as colonial still form the basis for most Christians understanding of sharing their faith. In addition to unlearning the unhealthy forms, there is (comparatively) little by way of alternative understandings (which translate into action). I know they are there, but the discipleship gap is huge, making the tendency to avoid evangelism understandable if not excusable. Does that make more sense?
jamie, sorry i’ve been so slow in responding. i do understand, now, what you mean.
i think i’d suggest it’s less of a problem with forms of evangelism — and more of a problem with a poor understanding of the kingdom and true worship.
Thanks James(Brett). I understand your answers and I do agree with most of it but in my opinion we need to be careful about referring to the path of discipleship (serving others, proclaiming the Word) as accomplishing Christ’s mission. Christ’s work was completed on the Cross. He already completed His mission and it is up to us to share that fact, and the tangential truths surrounding it, with those around us.
Another issue that no one has mentioned is that we seem to be talking about mission-work as existing primarily outside America. The sad fact that there are third-world countries who are sending their own missionaries to our inner-cities is shameful. Is there a need for international ministry? Of course. Does it outweigh the need to minister to our fellow countrymen/women? Absolutely not. In fact, our country is crumbling into a mess of secular humanism. Isn’t this something the Body of Christ here in America should address?
luke, i think i would disagree concerning Christ’s work having been completed in its totality on the cross. i understand justification and forgiveness of sins were completed on the cross, but i don’t know why we’d limit Christ’s mission to that alone. after all, there was a resurrection in which Christ overcame death once and for all — and that apparently occurred after his “work was completed on a cross.”
luke believed that Jesus had only begun to do and teach until he was taken up into heaven (acts 1). my understanding, then, is that the apostles (and soon after, all disciples), empowered by the Holy Spirit to indeed be the body of Christ, are to continue to do and teach what Jesus had begun.
i’d suggest Jesus mission was/is to bring reconciliation and abundant life to mankind, not to merely make such things possible.
as for our only addressing foreign missions in the comments section, i think that’s because the topic of the original post seemed to be discussing such. but i would agree with you completely that we ought to be reaching out to those within our own countries.
The sad fact that there are third-world countries who are sending their own missionaries to our inner-cities is shameful.
I’m not sure why. Is it shameful that we send missionaries to countries that already have very high Christian populations, such as Honduras, Mexico, and South Africa?
Thanks JamesBrett. I guess you and I just disagree a bit. When Christ uttered “it is finished” I believe His work was finished. The curtain in the temple was torn, opening the way for mankind’s reconciliation with the Father. Is there more work to do in order to spread the Gospel? Absolutely. But Christ’s work is done.
@ shakesperian – How did those countries (Honduras, Mexico, S Africa) come to hear the Gospel in the first place? Missionaries from what are now considered first-world countries. The shameful (and tragically ironic) part is that now they are having to reciprocate the gesture. The equivalent would be if the US Army had to bring in members of the Iraqi Defense Force to train our soldiers because our military was so broken that the Army had forgotten and neglected what our military had taught other nations. It’s a sign of the abject failure of the American church. The pastor of the largest church in America refuses to acknowledge the primacy of Christ on national television. And we wonder why our moral foundations have crumbled?
yeah, luke, i think our disagreement seems mostly to be with whether the work we’re to be doing belongs to Christ or… (not sure who you’d insert here — the HS or just us?). but i think we agree on what work we need to be doing, just maybe in whose name we’re doing it?
Great Post- As a missionary dentist in Kenya– I struggle frequently with am I doing enough evangelism..or just a lot of pulling teeth. I think it is fair to say the pendulum may have swung too far in favor of just social action.
I write about it this very same topic:
http://wwwfriessfamily.blogspot.com/2010/05/holism.html
Malin Friess (Wheaton 1998)
Luke, I’m talking about American missionaries who are currently going to places such as Honduras, Mexico, South Africa, etc., not historically.
Pingback: Linkworthy – 7/23/20 | MattCleaver.com
Great thoughts!!
I’d like to add that I understand where everyone is coming from when they say that short term missionaries shouldn’t preach the gospel. I have to ask then why are they there? Obviously, the answer to that is they are they to fulfill a need of some sort (i.e. build a house, provide food, etc). If you’ve ever read When Helping Hurts, it talks about these types of mission trips. Sometimes they can do more harm than good. Why not partner with an already existing organization & tell them about Jesus while you are there & trust that the existing organization will continue to disciple. I totally agree that you shouldn’t convert someone and then just leave them trying to figure it out for themselves. However, you also shouldn’t waste precious time while doing good deeds and NOT tell them about God. If done correctly, you CAN preach the gospel on a short term mission trip.
Lots to think about here, in the post and the comments. Appreciating the generosity of all who stir excellent and worthwhile thoughts into my days. Glad to have found my way here.
I’d highly recommend the book “Humanitarian Jesus – Social Justice and the Cross” by Christian Buckley & Ryan Dobson for further discussion on this very important topic.
I love your article. I am a missions pastor and we focus on UPG’s in North Africa and the Middle East. I have seen the exact same thing you speak of. Social Justice and Poverty eradication must be done simultaneously. And yes we evangelicals are the most pendulum swinging people around. Thanks!
Meant to say “Social Justice and Poverty eradication must be done simultaneously with the sharing of the gospel”
Social justice? Poverty “eradication”? In my estimation, these are not words that should be associated with the Gospel.
I’m still waiting for someone here to delineate the difference between justice and “social justice” for me. I’ve never found “social justice” in Scripture, justice is all over the Bible but “social justice” is not. As for poverty eradication, it will never happen. Christ Himself has said that the poor we will always have with us. Why? Ask any social worker with a good head on their shoulders. They’ll tell you that there will always be poor people because there will always be people who choose not to do the things necessary to lift themselves out of poverty. Can we provide aid and training? Can we help those people who want to escape poverty and are willing to work towards that end? Absolutely. In fact, we’re told to do so. But that’s poverty alleviation, not eradication. Eradication smacks of social utopia and that is the paean of humanism, not Christianity.
I haven’t done a full semantic study on the difference between biblical justice and social justice, but it seems to me that focusing on the difference is unnecessary. Justice in any form will affect society as a whole, and the Bible focuses on that kind of justice that protects and provides for the oppressed and marginalized (clearly, a society-affecting justice).
As a social worker who likes to think she has a good head on her shoulders, I do agree that we will always have the poor among us. Does that give us an “out” to not fervently seek justice on their behalf? Absolutely not! I work with the poor, the homeless, the mentally ill, and the addicted on a daily basis. While it is a common perception that the poor are poor because they simply lack the desire or willpower to “lift themselves out,” the truth is that most of those living in poverty, whether in the U.S. or abroad, are not there by choice. Chalk it up to cycles of poverty, oppression by the rich of the poor (yes, even in the good ole U.S. of A.), or mental illness, but please understand the solution is so much more than providing aid and training. If this was the case, I would stay in social work instead of working my way through law school.
I understand your resistance to the ideologies that seem to come out of a utopian worldview, but the Bible encourages us to share the Gospel with everyone in hopes that they may know Christ. Why should the goal to eradicate poverty be any different? If the Bible gives us commands throughout the Bible to seek justice for the poor and the oppressed, the orphan and the widow, why should we hold ourselves back simply because it is too ideal? Of course this justice-seeking cannot take the place of sharing the Gospel, but what better way to tangibly show the love of Christ than to give of ourselves in working to secure a better life for others?
In my opinion, the poor will always be with us not because of the habits and choices of the poor, but because of the conservative selfishness of the rich.
Thanks Sarah for your response. I think it’s important to do a semantic study on the differences between justice as we find it in the Bible and social justice as we find it on the lips of men. In my experience, people are talking about two completely different things when they discuss these two “ideals”. Justice is blind. Doesn’t matter if you are rich, poor, black, white, etc – justice is justice and should be equal and available for all. I am whole-heartedly in favor of this because we are told that God is perfect justice, and He tells us to seek it on behalf of each other. Social justice on the other hand, as I’ve been able to discern, is justice with an agenda. It is the desire to somehow “make things right” through restitution, redistribution of wealth, and other socialist schemes. This is not Biblical, in fact it is contrary to Biblical teachings about property and the charitable duty that we owe our brethren. Justice is justice. Social justice is justice sans blindfold, avec une agenda.
Did you read what I said, Sarah? I said that we have a duty to help the poor among us. I do not believe in generalizing about groups of people, so of course I do not think that “the poor are poor because they simply lack the desire or willpower to lift themselves out”, in my experience individuals in poverty who really don’t want to be in poverty and are willing to work, don’t stay poor too long. This is especially true here in America, where we have more opportunity than any nation in the history of the world. Are there mitigating exceptions to this? I’m sure there are. But I am speaking of individuals and opportunities available to them in this country, not speaking in the general.
I’m curious to hear what, besides aid and training, you feel we need to offer in the way of help to the poor.
You say you understand my “resistance” to Utopian ideologies, but it doesn’t seem that you do, Sarah. Utopian ideologies are heretical. I don’t “resist” them, they are anathema to me. There will be no Utopia here on Earth until Christ returns to establish His kingdom. To pretend otherwise, or act otherwise, demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of the Gospel of Christ. We should absolutely seek justice for the poor and the oppressed. Completely agree. But we should seek this justice with a clear understanding that we do so because God tells us to and because it honors Him, not because we are under the false assumption that we can achieve Utopia here on Earth. It’s a question of motivation, not the action itself.
Your last statement is utterly confusing. In your estimation, if all of the “rich” people in the world were forced to turn over their wealth and this wealth was spread among the poor of the world, poverty would be eliminated? You don’t really believe this do you? People are wicked and selfish. There is none who are righteous, no not one. Poverty is one of many social manifestations of this Scriptural truth.
The cure for this dilemma is “The Way of the Master” (www.livingwaters.com). After all, the result of achieving perfect utopian “social justice” and “eradication of poverty” on this Earth without proclaiming the Gospel as Jesus did it is happy, healthy people who spend eternity in the tortures of Hell.
Luke: I do appreciate your difference of opinion. Popular connotation is an important element in considering ministry activities/missions. However, I hate to see the Church shy away from “social justice” activities because others have perhaps used the term to describe so-called socialist activities. For the record, I do not agree that restitution is in any way a socialist scheme.
Yes, I read what you wrote very carefully. I read that you believe we should help “those people who want to escape poverty and are willing to work towards that end.” In my experience, is not always true that someone who is poor and willing to work does not stay poor for long. Most of my clients who are poor are either mentally ill, disabled, and/or addicted to substances. There are so many issues, too many to include in a blog comment, that hinder and limit the opportunities they have to work and even to access public assistance like Social Security and mental health care. I could give at least one story for each week I’ve worked as a social worker about the struggles these people face.
Besides aid and training, I believe it is critical to invest our lives, not just our money, with the poor. Referencing my “utterly confusing” statement, the “conservative selfishness of the rich” does not solely implicate finances. Actually, giving of finances is easy to do and Christians are doing a better job all the time in giving to the poor and giving to organizations that help the poor. Giving of self is much much harder. Some examples: the modern Church is very supportive of short-term missions, but few will leave their homes to move 15 miles into a neighborhood where even just their presence would do a world of good. Many Christians will spend one Saturday a month at a shelter feeding the homeless, but few will commit to building a consistent relationship with a homeless person. I know these steps cannot be mandated, nor would I want them to be, but I believe that transformational change will ultimately be the result of empowering and reciprocating relationships. Public policy changes to make the system work for the people instead of against them wouldn’t hurt either. (Sure, call me a heretical socialist if you want, but I have seen more people hurt by the current system than helped.)
Luke, ultimately I really think that we support the same things: showing the love and compassion of Jesus to others in hopes of bringing glory to our Father in Heaven. Hopefully through all our differences we can sharpen each other to be even more loving and compassionate and represent Christ well.
Perhaps this is the reason we missionaries in Western Europe are accused of not being “real” or “legitimate” missionaries–because we don’t have First-World deeds to perform. All we can do is share the Gospel because the deeds needs are already handled. People here may live in nice houses and drive nice cars, but with <1% evangelical Christian in most parts of Europe, they're still going to hell.
Pingback: From the Missionary Blogosphere | Missionary Confidential
Pingback: Interesting Thoughts for the Weekend « The Missional Edge
I don’t get this. Its obvious that eternal consequences far outweigh and immediate earthly need that is very very very temporary. The entire goal of a missionary should be to convert people to Christ. Doing good deeds and charity work is the way to open up a door to actually spread the gospel. I am very tired of Toms wearing “missionaries” spouting off liberal hippy nonsense. This most notably comes from postmodernist kids from Biola University whose mission trips are nothing but “christian” vacations. Its a joke. Stop studying missiology and pragmatism and start studying THEOLOGY! Then figure a way out to teach people about Jesus Christ through the Bible. Social justice kids are just pharisees in the guise of charity work who do a works based salvation through doing nice things. They have changed the entire meaning of the gospel and say it is an action of feeding poor or fighting sex trafficking etc…but thats not true. That is just what is an outcome of Christian faith. not the extent of it. Without telling people about Christ you leave that person in hell. How unloving. These postmodern emergent church missiologists are just cowards and want to feel special that they went to Africa to help build a water well. Or went to India to work at some orphan house…while a the same time smoking hooka and drinking. uuugh it makes me so furious.
Amen, brother.
Good works are a natural response to the grace shown by God to us sinners, but explaining the Gospels and leading people to Christ is the only priority. Everything else is of secondary importance.
Pingback: Best of the Blog’s First Five Years | The Search