Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

WARNING: Spoilers Galore!!

Someone once said that movies are not about reality, they are about other movies. This is never more true than in the films of Steven Spielberg, and especially in his Indiana Jones series. These are movies about the rousing spectacle that the moving image provides—the exotic adventures in faraway lands, outlandish stunts, and over-the-top action sequences that have been, since the very earliest days of silent cinema, the bread and butter of popular moviegoing.

The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is no different, and I’m so very glad. I loved loved loved this movie. Of course it helps that I’m something of a 50s-phile. The American postwar era in all of its technocratic, Levittown, Howdy Doody glory (with a little Cold War paranoia thrown in!) is my favorite of all historical periods. I nearly leapt out of my seat with glee at the rousing shot of Indy’s profile as he stands in front of the mushroom cloud. That amazing shot should’ve been the billboard for the film: welcome, Indiana Jones, to the Nuclear Age! Instead of Nazis there are now menacing Russians—vicious, cold, communist Russians, bound and determined to win the race for that most precious of Sputnik-era commodities: knowledge.

Skull lives and dies (mostly lives) by its placement within a Cold War context. But more than a real historical setting, Skull exists in the cinematic history of the era. Spielberg has an obvious affection for B movie kitsch of the 30s, 40s, and 50s, and it shows in the Indiana Jones films. The earlier trilogy was set in the 1930s, and as such was heavily constructed from the films of that era, whether jungle serials, adventure films (such as 1939’s Gunga Din which served as the inspiration for Temple of Doom), musicals (as in 1936’s Anything Goes, also referenced in Doom), B westerns (The Last Crusade), and various war/anti-Nazi films of the late 30s.

With Skull, which is set in 1957, Spielberg is in full on 50s mode, and he excels at recreating this decade. The pop culture of the era is excavated in Skull as if it were an Indy-commissioned archeological dig. We get some Elvis, greaser gangs, poodle skirts, burger joints, Red-scare protests, and Area 51 UFO paranormal anomalies, among other things.

Unsurprisingly, Skull is also chalk full of cinematic references. The dramatic entrance of Shia LaBeouf is a can’t-miss nod to Marlon Brando in 1953’s The Wild One, and at other times Shia invokes such cinematic icons as Tarzan, Spiderman, and any number of Errol Flynn-era swashbuckling swordsmen. There are also vestiges of classic Cold War sci-fi cinema here—films like 1951’s The Day The Earth Stood Still and 1954’s buggy Them!

Of course Skull is also heavily self referential, with loads of nods to the other Indy films, as well as Spielberg’s broader cinematic portfolio. The film opens with a nice homage to Spielberg’s very first film, 1971’s Duel, and later contains direct references to George Lucas’ 1973 classic, American Graffiti. Of course, by the final scene we see that Spielberg is borrowing heavily from his various alien films too (Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T., A.I. etc), with special affinity with the whole “they’re been here for a long time” plot of War of the Worlds.

Indeed, while many fans have decried the outrageous ending of Skull (as somehow going “too far”), I absolutely loved it. Is it really that much more ridiculous to imagine an ancient civilization being built by aliens than it is to believe that the Ark of the Covenant melts peoples’ faces off? Or that Indy can walk on air to get to the Holy Grail? C’mon, people: these films are not about verisimilitude or physical reality. They’re about the fantastic and wonderful possibilities of cinema to throw some craziness in front of our eyes.

I thought the ending of Skull was in perfect keeping with what the film is ultimately about: 1950s culture. Science fiction paranoia (an outgrowth of Cold War uncertainties about nuclear technology) was crucial to that time period, never more than in the movies that came out of it. And the whole “I want to know” theme of Skull also reflects the tenor of the time—when the military industrial complex was reliant on specialized scientific knowledge, Freud-inspired psychoanalysis was in vogue, and education (the systematic accumulation of knowledge) was the highest-stakes battleground in the Russian-U.S. power struggle. No wonder Indy is so concerned that Junior go back to school!

As smart as it is in its commentary on Cold War America, Skull is, at the end of the day, mostly just a thrill ride of a movie (quite literally). Film historians often look back to Temple of Doom as the first “theme park” movie: what with its roller coaster mine sequence, snow-and-whitewater raft adventure, etc. Skull features (on my count) at least six sequences that could be turned into thrill rides at Disneyland: the nuclear launcher ride that Indy shares with the Russian thug, the flying refrigerator, the motorcycle chase, Mutt’s flying trapeze adventure, the boat-over-waterfalls sequence, and the spinning alien saucer launch sequence. I can’t wait for the ride!

Honestly,I don’t think Skull could possibly have been any better than this. As a 20-years-later installment with a 65-year-old lead actor and two decades of imitators (The Mummy, National Treasure, etc) to overcome, Skull faced a major uphill battle. Amazingly, it all turned out brilliantly—with a little originality mixed with a LOT of referentiality, some appropriate newness (CGI, Shia LaBeouf) complimenting a huge amount of necessary old stuff (the hat! the snakes! the bugs! the music!), and a formidable sense of blockbuster exuberance that Spielberg has—since Jaws—evoked better than just about anyone.

Advertisements

8 responses to “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

  1. Just for the record, there are no aliens in A.I..

    I’m not so wild about the nostalgia aspect of this movie, myself. As far as I can recall, the original Indy films were never about the pop culture of the ’30s, beyond the Cole Porter / Busby Berkeley bit that begins Temple of Doom. Yeah, they were inspired by old movie serials from the ’30s and ’40s, but the character apparently owed as much to Charlton Heston’s performance in The Secret of the Incas in ’54, and various other things besides. Despite taking place in the ’30s, the original films just didn’t feel like time capsules the way that Crystal Skull does.

    Not that there’s anything necessarily wrong with that. But it’s just one of many reasons why this film doesn’t really feel “of a piece” with the existing franchise.

  2. Yes but you have to admit those robots at the end of A.I. look almost exactly like the aliens at the end of Skull! Who knows, maybe the “inter-dimensional beings” in Skull are actually mechanical robots (they are hyper-magnetic, after all) of some sort.

  3. I prefer the Nazi villains and religious relics of the original films. The 1950’s stuff didn’t work for me, but maybe that’s because I’m not too fond of the time period, while I am obsessed with the 1930’s and 1940’s.

    Still, I generally liked the film. I agree with your opening paragraph and I think many of the negative reviews floating around out there for Crystal Skull seem to forget that some movies aren’t meant to be realistic and are simply about trying to recapture previous movie magic.

    Check out my review of the film:

    http://davethenovelist.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/a-review-of-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/

  4. Yeah the one very interesting change was between a spiritual, and scifi movement.

  5. Hmm… I would agree with you on almost everything, except i really do think they should have saved all the cgi for the last sequence. Why throw the cgi into the last car chase sequence in the jungle? For example, when mutt is standing on both of the cars, and they begin to drive away from each other, as he is wielding the sword, the shots from far away that are filming a real stunt look great, on par with the action in raiders. But it is totally ruined when there is an upclose of shia’s face and the cgi is ridiculous.

    It was great to see indy back on screen though, the thrills were still there. It was great to hear a new villain utter the words “Dr. Jones”, lol.

  6. A seminarian friend of mine had an interesting perspective. Now that Dr. Jones knows undoubtedly that there is a God (and Yhwh/Jesus is him), AND he knows undoubtedly about the existence of aliens/inter-dimensional being, does this mean they need to be saved? Should Indy now have a burden to reach the inter-dimensional?!?

  7. Pingback: Film Forum: Sex and the City; Reprise; Stuck; Bigger, Stronger, Faster; Body of War; Savage Grace; The Edge of Heaven; Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull;

  8. Pingback: Film Forum: Sex and the City; Reprise; Stuck; Bigger, Stronger, Faster; Body of War; Savage Grace; The Edge of Heaven; Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull; | Looking Closer with Jeffrey Overstreet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s