Yes on Propositions Nuance, Charity, and Reason

lincoln-douglas-debate

Regardless of the outcome of today’s election (I can’t believe I’m saying today’s election!), there are at least two truths that we will all wake up to tomorrow:

Half of America will be discouraged and maybe even resentful.

None of America’s problems will have been solved.

Perhaps because it is the culmination of nearly four years of politics at its most exhausting, this election day feels like it’s one of the most significant days in recent history. But as much as November 4, 2008 has been talked about, debated, anticipated, and feared, we must all remember: it is still only one day. It is the election of a president. It isn’t the changing of the world.

Sure, the electing of the U.S. President is hugely important. I don’t dispute that. But it takes more than a president to change things, and neither John McCain nor Barack Obama has the power to heal this country and this world alone. It’s kind of ridiculous, when you think about it, that we put so much energy, money, time, and emotion into the electing of one candidate. Between the campaigns of McCain, Obama, and Hillary Clinton, over $1 billion has been spent on this presidential race. What problems might have been solved, pain assuaged, or suffering ended with even half of that money?

Alas, what’s done is done. We must move on from here. The truth is, I don’t hold all that much hope for America, no matter who is elected. The problem is not with the skills or qualifications of the candidates. I trust them both. The problems are wider, more systemic, from Wall Street to Wasilla, Capital Hill to Coit Tower, sea to shining sea, and beyond.

The problem with America is not the ineptitude of Congress, though they are an ugly example of it. Our problem is that we can’t handle nuance. We’re too impatient for complexity, too lazy for sound reasoning, too selfish to give and take charity, too uneducated to know the much of anything about the economy (supposedly the issue most important to us), and too prone to think and be whatever the media says we are.

Last night I was at the Wilshire screening room for a press screening of Pray the Devil Back to Hell. A pair of particularly virulent Obama supporters sat behind me, and their chatter was predictable. “My dog is smarter than Sarah Palin,” one of them said. “She’s pure evil. I can’t understand how anyone could support her… I almost hope that if McCain is elected, something happens to him and Palin becomes president. Then people would see how stupid they were to vote for her.”

Horrifying comments like this are par for the course these days, on both sides of the aisle. Hateful words have been leveled against Obama by McCain supporters, just as these women expressed their despicable sentiments about Palin.

It was ironic that these comments prefaced a film as earnest and hopeful as Pray the Devil Back to Hell, a documentary about the women’s peace movement in Liberia, when Christian and Muslim women came together to pray and protest for peace in their country which was being torn apart by belligerent warring factions. America, so long defined by the sort of cyclical revenge/pissing contest mentality that ravages countries like Liberia, could learn from what these women did: they put their collective foot down and said “Enough! We have to stop fighting!”

I’m sure it’s impractical to hope that fighting and partisan dueling will stop completely in America, but I do hope that Americans will soon realize that—for the good of this nation, our children, our future—we have to put our foot down and take matters into our own hands. Governments around the world and throughout time have proven that they can’t make change nearly as readily or effectively as can the populace. That is, unless the populace is too lazy or ill-equipped to tackle problems and make progress.

The challenge moving forward is to quit spending so much time complaining about who’s in charge and what they’re not doing. We should instead spend our time and energy in learning how to solve problems ourselves, how to accept and understand the complexities of things, how to get our children educated and engaged in critical thought again. We should turn off cable news and rebel against the idiot media that insists on reducing the world to Joe the Plumber, Jeremiah Wright, and campaign wardrobes. We should demand that someone, anyone, tell us the truth, challenge us with an objective, nonpartisan, nuanced examination of the issues.

It’ll be hard, but we must accept the challenge. We must re-discover the beauty of reason, that we can and should think for ourselves; we must stop the politics of resentment and revenge and realize that love and charity will move far more mountains that moveon.org. We must stop our silly tendency to pin our hopes on one man, one ideology, one way to fix the problems in the world. That is, unless we’re talking about Jesus.

13 responses to “Yes on Propositions Nuance, Charity, and Reason

  1. Fantastic. I couldn’t have said it better myself. Thanks for verbalizing the thoughts I’ve been having for so long.

  2. Hear, hear!
    I posted some similar, although not nearly as well-written, at my site last night.
    I particularly agree with your conclusions about our need to redevelop critical thinking skills and the behaviors they motivated.
    [Our problem is that we can’t handle nuance. We’re too impatient for complexity, too lazy for sound reasoning, too selfish to give and take charity, too uneducated to know the much of anything about the economy (supposedly the issue most important to us), and too prone to think and be whatever the media says we are.] Gregory Wolfe made a statement in a recent book review at the Image blog that has been rolling around in my brain as I feel perplexed by our engagement with the political process.
    “”Robert Clark’s books contain what all those studies on the decline of reading claim that our culture is losing: sensitivity of perception, precise language, and the kind of rich interiority that evokes complex emotional responses to the human condition.”
    Thank you for your perceptive and respectful post.

  3. A hearty “Amen” to that Brett. Well said. As I said to a friend yesterday, it seems we’ve sold our spiritual birthright for a bowl of socio-political stew which may temporarily satisfy our craving but make us nauseous tomorrow.

    As you said, “our problem is that we can’t handle nuance.” So true.

    Sign me up for the challenge.

  4. Great summation Brett. I think we have been so isolated from any real suffering and persecution (see Zimbabwe, Burma, DR Congo, etc) for so long, blessedly, that we are finding things to complain about instead of simply realizing how blessed we are. We can see this illustration played out in the nation of Israel’s story in the OT. Prosperity leads to complacency leads to arrogance leads to a fall. I hope that we can learn from history to avoid being doomed to repeat it.

    Thanks again for the thoughtful (and thought-provoking!) post, Brett.

  5. Great thoughts. You captured much of the way I’ve been feeling. Thanks.

  6. Well said, Brett. Thank you.

  7. Thanks Brett. Although I guess I now know which side of the top-down/bottom-up divide you stand on. ;-)

  8. Wow – perfect. Thanks for putting words to our feelings. This will definitely be passed on….

  9. Pingback: Brett McCracken on Propositions, Nuance, Charity, and Reason « Think. Pray. Love.

  10. Brett, even though I commented earlier – your article has stuck with me so much that I would love to have your permission to share it with my classes. I teach high school in a northern suburb of Indianapolis, IN. It is an affleunt community and I think the students could really use a dose of this reality. Thanks.

  11. I was watching Obama’s speech with a friend, and she was trying to get me in the mood to memorialize it as a historic moment. all i could say was “unless it brings glory to God…unless you’re talking about Jesus Christ…I really don’t care.”
    Everything else…just seems so boring to me.

  12. Good thoughts. The problem lies in the fact that pure reason does not exist. All men carry into every argument the baggage of their experiences and prejudices. Also before completely lose heart from the virulent excesses of recent campaigns, we need to realize that this is nothing new and in fact compared with the days of old it has been downright civil.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s