Trending Topic: Health Care Reform

The debate has been raging for more than a year now, but until Sunday night when the Senate’s health care bill finally passed, the discourse had largely been the domain of political junkies, Fox News Tea Partiers, and otherwise outspoken partisans. The rest of us were minding our own business, unsure exactly what was in the legislation and certainly ill-suited to comment on the whole enterprise in any sort of intelligent way.

But not anymore! The minute–literally, the minute–the House of Representatives passed the bill–which will cost an estimated $940 billion over 10 years and expand health care to 32 million more Americans–people who had been largely silent on the matter began to get very loud about it on Facebook, Twitter, and whatever other social media (Google Buzz?) they might have had at their disposal.

Everyone all of a sudden became alarmingly, proudly partisan. Liberals rushed to tweet things about this being a “historic moment” and how “now we are more like Canada.” Conservatives swiftly updated their Facebook statuses with emotional outbursts about things like “baby killers” and “socialist utopias” and “the constitution being shredded by Democrats.”

Within a few hours after the bill had passed, it seemed that if you weren’t publicly announcing your allegiance in this hotly contested battle (however ill-informed you were on the details), you were missing out.

Welcome to the age of instant, public, recreational prognosticating. We are all talking heads. We all have something to say. And nothing but our cell phones and a “send” command is keeping our “expert” thoughts from reaching the masses.

But do we really want to be so public about our politics? Think about all the people you are friends with on Facebook—employers, friends, family, coworkers, potential collaborators… all with a diversity of political opinions and varying degrees of patience with people who disagree with them. Is it really crucial that they all know where you fall on the issue of health care?

Of course, this raises a larger question for our culture today: Why are we so obsessed with expressing our opinions to a vast and unseen digital audience via social media “status updates”? Is anyone that eager to know that “I’m glad we have health care reform” or “I think Obamacare will ruin everything”?

I’m not sure anyone is.

But maybe that doesn’t matter. Maybe the reason people rant and rave so publicly these days is not because they care if anyone is listening; maybe they just want to be part of the conversation. Tweeting about breaking news allows us to feel part of the drama. Chiming in about the health care controversy keeps us from becoming obsolete in the cultural zeitgeist. Perhaps it helps us, in some small way, become more invested in matters of national policy.

But I’m guessing it mostly helps us become more invested in hearing ourselves speak and seeing our opinions proliferated. And I’m not sure the world needs any more of that.

About these ads

9 Responses to Trending Topic: Health Care Reform

  1. I’ve been so aware of this in the past few days! It’s been driving me a little batty on Facebook (less so on Twitter — perhaps the people I follow on Twitter are just a bit more chill).

    Part of the reason I feel batty about it is because I didn’t keep up with the debate well at all … which means I found myself with no right to an opinion on the matter. So with emotions flying high on both sides, I had to just sit, watch, absorb, and feel uncomfortable.

    The other reason I felt batty is because of what you mentioned in your post: when we take an extreme view on something as divisive as politics, what are the effects on our readers? I feel alienated from those whose opinions are so vehement that there’s no room for real conversation. Therefore someone I care to know becomes someone I feel I can’t know in the interesting way I would like.

    You and I have talked before about social media and what it says about us as people — are we narcissists, or are we just looking for love? (Or both.) I’m trying to decide what a helpful, balanced, un-narcissistic, un-divisive use of Twitter and Facebook would be. Perhaps it’s the giving and sharing of ideas that promote conversation and thoughtfulness by all parties.

  2. Amen Brett, Amen

  3. pursuingintegration

    So true. I go to a fairly conservative college, so my Facebook home page got lit up with a litany of Obama hate status updates. It can be very frustrating. There is no way to have constructive dialogue commenting on a Facebook status. Especially about politics.

  4. Agreed. I’ve significantly reduced my Facebook time because of that very reason. I feel too often that people like to spout off about things on ‘Status Updates’ that they would never actually say in a face to face conversation with someone. Status Update = Soap Box

  5. I absolutely agree. Being a Canadian in the U.S. gives me a kind of outside perspective from within. The way I see it, people just love a strong opinion, especially when it’s their own or just confirms their own. Many us look to our country’s leaders and see deep partisan divides, so we think, “Oh! I guess I need to pick a side too.” So we pick a side, raise our flag and fight against the ideological enemy like the fate of the world is at stake.

    That’s obviously not true for everyone, but it’s sad (and slightly amusing) to hear or read someone loudly lament the death of Constitutional America . . . just because of what the TV told them.

    Of course there’s nothing wrong with having an opinion, but, as you said, just make sure it’s well-researched and realistic before it gets broadcast to the world.

  6. I’ve been one of those who followed this from the beginning, so I feel like I do have an informed opinion. I’m not ashamed to be vocal about it because this is not a new phenomenon, the venue has simply changed. Americans have always “talked shop” it just usually didn’t happen on such a wide platform. Traditionally, this type of political evaluation and pontification happened in church socials, over the fence with a neighbor, or in a barber shop. Instead, we now feel more comfortable doing an e-blast to all our contacts then we do discussing these issues with the people who have lived next door to us for years.

    I’m not very concerned about this phenomenon, in its modern manifestation. Actually, I think it’s a sign that people are becoming more politically aware. This is not a bad thing. It can be an annoying thing, but overall it’s good for the country. The more people we have active and involved, the more accountable our leaders will be and the more accurately we can reflect the will of the people through our elections.

    It may be annoying, but as far as I am aware all of these social networking sites have an “ignore” or “hide” option. Let’s not write off people who passionately believe in an issue and are working towards helping to inform their friends and family. Are there some uninformed-parrots on Facebook? Of course. Most people are sheeple and repeat what someone told them, but it provides an opportunity to engage people in a discussion to find out how they came to believe what they believe (if the opinion is contrary to my own) or how we can work together (if the opinion is complementary).

  7. I agree completely with Luke. I’m not alarmed by the social networking aspect of political dialog– I am alarmed by the effects of the fracturing media: namely that it becomes increasingly easier for people to access information from sources with which they already agree, combined with the accelerating reliance on context-free infobites.

  8. hello, I am new here Does anyone know how I can save videos from You Tube to my work computer?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s